• One Explanation For Sigil Bleed

    by  •  • Magic, Science, Sigils • 8 Comments

    Send to Kindle

    My ongoing sigil adventures have got me thinking.

    I am dissatisfied with prevailing theories of accidentally launched signals because they rely on notions that I have no evidence for: Principal among these being my improvement as a magician.

    In one of those bibliomantic synchronicities that befalls voluminous readers such as ourselves, I may have been steered me in a more agreeable direction.

    It was whilst reading Blink on the tube home that I re-encountered the notion of priming.

    The book itself doesn’t open with the same high impact as most of Gladwell’s other efforts and -to be honest- I was finding the argument for rapid cognition to be a little slim.

    It’s not. It just the book opens with a quirky rather than a high impact anecdote.

    Anyway, I had decided to give the book one last commute home to get good before I shelved it. (I don’t read books all the way through if they aren’t worth it.) And the book saved itself from early retirement by reintroducing me to:

    Priming

    Priming is something I remember learning in a class called Communication and Information Environments. Beyond that I haven’t given it much thought because I tend to think positive thinking is a dangerous modern thought virus. (Note that I consider being a happy person as a completely separate notion. Obviously.)

    On second reading, I would say priming is an idea that will resonate with most magical folk. And may have some application for my sigil question.

    • In 1996, John Bargh, a Yale psychologist, created a test where subjects were implicitly primed with words that related to old age (‘Florida’, ‘elderly’, ‘retired’, etc) in some simple sentence games. After the test, the subjects moved slower as if they had themselves aged.
    • A similar test was performed using violent or aggressive words. The subjects were then asked to go to a room at the end of the hall where they found someone (an actor) blocking the door and carrying on a conversation with someone inside the room. Those that had been exposed to the aggressive words spoke up much sooner than those that hadn’t.
    • Here’s the scariest one: A 1995 test conducted with black students using 20 college entrance questions found that the number of items they got correct was cut in half if they were asked to identify their race at the beginning of an exam. In. Half.

    So clearly, even in muggle-land, your daily life and performance can vary in the most wild and extreme ways simply based on the words and images you are exposed to. (Sidebar: Think of the implications of this for kids growing up in disadvantaged areas.)

    What happens if, like ourselves, you live at the spookier end of the reality spectrum?

    The implied magical connection

    So we have

    • Priming: Undisputed psychological data that reading or looking at words can drastic affect your mental state and thus the world around you.
    • Sigils: A proven magical technology based on the idea of mashing words down into the unconscious to deliver a real world outcome.

    You can see how these two ideas hang in the air near each other like soap bubbles. Any next step in trying to bridge them is speculating beyond the data.

    I know it’s super-tempting to leave a comment ‘explaining’ how these ideas link up. But don’t. Just keep those two ideas near each other as soap bubbles. Here’s a good discussion piece on priming to get you… Uh…. Primed.

    Also maybe think about the implications of priming on your other magical activities. I’m thinking in particular about divination. How much does staring at a bunch of words and pictures on cards create a self-fulfillment loop in yours or your client’s brain. Is there any way you can use that?

    Comments and suggestions please.

    About

    London-based occultist and pseudo-pseudohistorian. Messes about with sigils. Travels a lot but is otherwise extremely lazy.

    http://runesoup.com

    8 Responses to One Explanation For Sigil Bleed

    1. Alex
      June 30, 2010 at 5:22 pm

      “Sigils: A proven magical technology based on the idea of mashing words down into the unconscious to deliver a real world outcome.”

      I don’t mean this as a troll, and please don’t take this as one, but sigils made this way just don’t work for me. Other magical techniques work just great, and I tried sigils with a very open mind, but they just did not work at all.

      I only mention this because I wonder if you’re trying to say, “sigils are a proven magical technology _for me_,” which I could absolutely agree with, or if you’re trying to say “sigils have been shown objectively to be effective,” in which case I have to take exception.

    2. June 30, 2010 at 5:57 pm

      Alex: Well, you got shafted a bit then, man…

      … Are you not a visual learner?
      Jack Faust´s last blog post ..Daleks Do Not Accept Apologies

    3. Alex
      June 30, 2010 at 8:31 pm

      Yes, more tactile — do you have advice?

    4. July 1, 2010 at 6:47 am

      The example you gave was of a phone call where a client was about to ring you. In this case, you might be giving credit to the sigil when it was more of telepathy? Today a friend called me whom I hadn’t heard from in 6 months, that I just had been talking about. Do you have any other examples of the sigils going off without a ceremony? After you create them, how much energy do you typically give to them before destroying them?

    5. July 3, 2010 at 4:56 pm

      @Alex I think it’s not unreasonable to say ‘proven technology’ … As far as we can use that word at all in magic… given their sustained use for more than a century. It’s proven in aggregate.

      Otherwise it would be like saying “appendectomies don’t cure appendicitis” just because you don’t know how to cut one out of someone.

    6. Alex
      July 3, 2010 at 5:34 pm

      That’s fair, I guess, although it seems a bit like saying, “ceremonial magic always works, and if it doesn’t work for you, you’re just doing it wrong.”. After all, I thought Chaos magic prided itself on how scientific it is, unlike all those charlatans out there who blame “disbelief in the observer” for their failures.

      Anyway, I’m getting needlessly strident. What Jack said inspired me to give them another chance, after reading through the “rune soup book game curriculum.”. I shall see what happens.

    7. July 3, 2010 at 5:42 pm

      Well, it’s not really like saying that.

      If something is proven in aggregate, it means that sometimes it won’t work but when you aggregate a large number of results together you can make a reasoned assumption.

      I wouldn’t say there’s blame in it at all.

      For instance, I’ve never got much from chakra work but I’d still consider it effective in aggregate.

    8. Pingback: Why Belief Is The Wrong Word To Use

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    CommentLuv badge