• Your Gods Will Taste Different Tomorrow

    by  •  • Rants • 4 Comments

    It's amazing what you'll throw overboard when you have to

    If you maintain a chaos magic blog, belief as a topic returns with the tiresome regularity of cold sores.

    As previously discussed, it’s not a term that greatly appeals to me.

    But it has returned now.

    It has returned because we seemingly have an innate need to narrativise disruption. (I’m only being half-ironic with my apocalypse tagging.)

    Beliefs, it seems to me, only become useful once we realise that they drift:

    The human idea of God has a history, since it always means something slightly different to each group of people who have used it at various points of time. The idea of God formed in one generation by one set of human beings could be meaningless in another.

    Indeed, the statement “I believe in God” has no objective meaning, as such, but like any other statement only means something in context, when proclaimed by a particular community. Consequently there is no one unchanging idea contained in the word “God”; instead the word contains a whole spectrum of meanings, some of which are contradictory or mutually exclusive.

    Had the notion of God not had this flexibility, it would not have survived to become one of the great human ideas.

    When one conception of God has ceased to have meaning or relevance, it has been quietly discarded and replaced by a new theology. A fundamentalist would deny this, since fundamentalism is antihistorical: it believes that Abraham, Moses and the later prophets all experienced their God in exactly the same way as people do today. Yet if we look at [our three] religions, it becomes clear that there is no objective view of “God”: each generation has to create the image of God that works for them. The same is true of atheism. The statement “I do not believe in God” has meant something slightly different at each point in history. The people who have been dubbed “atheists” over the years have always denied a particular conception of the divine.

    That’s from Karen Armstrong’s A History of God. It’s relevance to us is down to that turn of phrase “one of the great human ideas”. Because we are in the market for some good ideas right now.

    Once every one and a half days, some of my liberal dickbag friends manage to slide across my social graph some magnificently ignorant soundbite or another to do with the Occupy movement or similar. Some inbred “Presidential nominee” or similar will take a break from threatening to invade Mexico or accusing China of shooting down satellites with futuristic lasers to get all Biblical about this global groundswell.

    And it makes you think: Would Jesus be standing there on Wall Street in a Guy Fawkes mask? (Pause to enjoy the irony of that particular original religious symbolism.) The short answer is yes. And if he wasn’t, we’d make him:

    Despite its otherworldliness, religion is highly pragmatic. We shall see that it is far more important for a particular idea of God to work than for it to be logically or scientifically sound. As soon as it ceases to be effective it will be changed – sometimes for something radically different.

    This did not disturb the monotheists before our own day because they were quite clear that their ideas about God were not sacrosanct but could only be provisional. They were entirely man-made – they could be nothing else – and quite separate from the indescribable Reality they all symbolized.

    Karen Armstrong again. Why bring this up?

    Because times are tough. Because the pipes in your house might be new but the water that comes out of them is still the same stuff in total volume and make-up that’s been with us since water first appeared on our silly little planet. (Sidebar: ask Dawkins where water came from. Bam.)

    Because we can’t afford to have you getting tangled in old ideas when the world really needs you to bring your A-game. Because we need people who can find love in hopeless places. (Sidebar: the song of winter. I love Calvin Harris.)

    Because -apocalypse or not- we really need you to bring your Best God. That’s superheroics right there.

    Speaking of, check out this video. Please watch the whole thing. It’ll be the best twelve minutes you spend all night.

     

    About

    London-based occultist and pseudo-pseudohistorian. Messes about with sigils.Travels a lot but is otherwise extremely lazy.

    http://runesoup.com

    4 Responses to Your Gods Will Taste Different Tomorrow

    1. October 26, 2011 at 11:42 am

      Oh, Gordon, you and your video just made me weepy at 6:30am here. I am grateful for it.
      Jow´s last [type] ..Selling Out, Buying In, and Shutting Up.

    2. October 26, 2011 at 11:49 am

      But mostly the video, right?

      Because usually when I make boys cry at 6:30am in the morning, well… it’s not great for my self esteem, let me just say that.

      Great video, though, right? Inspiration to fill the tank for months.

    3. Anne
      October 28, 2011 at 8:28 pm

      This is only tangentially related, but I’ve been asking myself this for a while now, and perhaps you have some ideas about this. A few years ago, say, around the time it became clear that the economy would tank, I noticed that one of the words that kept popping up was “Titan” as in Titans of Industry, but it would show up everywhere, not just in discussions of business. Then I read a bestselling teen series about greek demigods “The Lightning Thief” Percy Jackson series by Rick Riordan (& published by Disney’s Hyperion – not the awful movie). And now I see promoted a movie called “Immortals” about basically the same idea, and that is all about the conflict between the Titans and Greek gods or Earth vs. Civilization. And there’s generally an undercurrent about civilization and the value of wildness (progress vs. environmentalism and indigeneity) in these stories and I think, in the world in general. Why is our culture re-invoking these gods? I’m thinking this is kind of a deliberate rehash of an old battle, when maybe we could use a fresh story, with a different set of characters?

    4. October 29, 2011 at 1:31 pm

      @Anne fascinating perspective.

      But could it not also be a bit chicken and the egg? Are we invoking and thus causing catastrophe or is catastrophe awakening in us a need to use these symbols to understand our situation?

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    CommentLuv badge